Supplementary Order Paper Nov 2000
This copy of the document has been entered by hand and may contain errors. If in doubt, consult a paper copy from the Government Bookshop.
Original typing & markup by David Zanetti, minor corrections made and hyperlinks added by Don Stokes.
House of Representatives Supplementary Order Paper
Tuesday, 7 November 2000Proposed amendments
Hon Paul Swain, in Committee, to move the following amendments:
New heading and clauses 16A to 16E inserted
To insert, after clause 16 (which appears on page 9), the following heading and clauses:
Crimes against personal privacy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16A | Interpretation Section 216A(1) of the principal Act is amended by repealing subsection (1), and substituting the following subsection: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"(1) | In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,---; " foreign intelligence means information relating to the capabilities, intentions, or activities of---
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16B | Prohibition on use of listening devices | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Section 216B of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device" in both places where they appear, and substituting in each case the words "an interception device". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) | Section 216B (3)(b) of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "the listening device" in both places where they appear, and substituting in each case the words "the interception device". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) | Section 216B of the principal Act is amended by adding the following subsections: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"(5) | Subsection (1) does not apply to the interception of private communications by any interception device operated by the Government Communications Security Bureau for the purpose of intercepting private communications that are both---
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"(6) | Subsection (1) does not apply to the interception of private communications by any interception device operated by a person engaged in providing an INternet or other communications service to the public if the interception is carried out---
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) | Section 216B of the principal Act is amended by omitting from the heading the words " listening devices ", and substituting the words " interception devices ". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16C | Prohibition on disclosure of private communication unlawfully intercepted Section 216C (2)(b)(ii) of principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device" and substituting the words "an interception device". |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16D | Prohibition on dealing, etc, with listening devices Section 216D of the principal Act is amended---
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16E | Forfeiture Section 216E of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "listening device" wherever they appear, and substituting in each case the words "interception device" |
Clause 19
To add to new section 305ZD (after line 39 on page 23) the following definitions:
" foreign intelligence has the same meaning as in section 216A(1) " foreign organisation " has the same meaning as in section 216A(1) " foreign person has the same meaning as in section 216A(1). |
To insert, after new section 305ZF (after line 32 on page 24), the following sections:
"305ZFA Accessing computer system without authorisation | |||||||||||||
"(1) | Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years who intentionally accesses, directly or indirectly, any computer system or part of a computer system without authorisation knowing that he or she is not authorised to access that computer system or part of that computer system. | ||||||||||||
"(2) | To avoid doubt, subsection (1) does not apply if a person is authorised to access a computer system or part of a computer system for a specified purpose or purposes but accesses it for some other purpose or purposes. | ||||||||||||
"305ZFB Qualified exemption to access without authorisation offence for New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Section 305ZFA does not apply if---
|
|||||||||||||
"305ZFC Qualified exemption to access without authorisation offence for Government Communications Security Bureau | |||||||||||||
"(1) | Section 305ZFA does not apply if the person access a computer system or part of a computer system---
|
||||||||||||
"(2) | The Minister responsible for the Government Communications Security Bureau may authorise an employee of the Government Communications Security Bureau to access a computer system or part of the computer system of a specified foreign organisation or foreign person if the Minister---
|
||||||||||||
"305ZFD Qualified exemption to access without authorisation for law enforcement agencies | |||||||||||||
To avoid doubt, if access to a computer system or part of a computer system is gained under the execution of an interception warrant, search warrant, or other legal authority, such access does not constitute an offense under section 305ZFA |
Heading above clause 20
To omit the heading immediately above clause 20 on page 30, and substitute the following heading:
Other Amendments to the principal Act
New clause 20A
To insert, after clause 20 (which appears on page 30), the following clause:
20A | Heading to Part XIA amended The heading to Part XIA of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words " listening devices " and substituting the words " interception devices " |
Clause 21
To omit the clause (which appears on pages 30 and 31), and substitute the following clauses:
21 | Interpretation | ||||||||||
(1) | Section 312(A) of the principal Act is amended by repealing the definitions of intercept and private communication , and substituting, respectively, the following definitions: " intercept , in relations to private communication, includes hear, listen to, record, monitor, acquire, or receive the communication either---
|
||||||||||
(2) | Section 312A (1) of the principal Act is amended by repealing the definition of listening device . | ||||||||||
(3) | Section 312A (1) of the principal Act is amended by inserting, in it's appropriate alphabetical order, the following definition: " interception device ---
|
||||||||||
(4) | Section 312A (1) of the principal Act is amended by repealing paragraphs (d) to (f) of the definition of specified offense , and substituting the following paragraphs:
|
||||||||||
21A | Application by Police for a warrant to intercept private communications | ||||||||||
(1) | Section 312B (1) of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "listening device", and substituting the words "an interception device". | ||||||||||
(2) | Sections 312B(1) of the principal Act is amended by repealing paragraph (c), and substituting the following paragraph:
|
||||||||||
21B | Matters on which Judge must be satisfied in respect of applications Section 312C(1)(b) of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device", and substituting the words "an interception device". |
||||||||||
21C | Application by Police for a warrant to intercept private communications in relation to serious violent offences | ||||||||||
(1) | Section 312CA of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device" wherever they appear, and substituting in each case the words "an interception device". | ||||||||||
(2) | Section 312CA (2)(c) is amended by repealing subparagraph (ii), and substituting the following subparagraph:
|
||||||||||
21D | Matters on which Judge must be satisfied in respect of applications relating to serious violent offences Section 312CB of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device" wherever they appear, and substituting in each case the words "an interception device". |
||||||||||
21E | Contents and term of a warrant | ||||||||||
(1) | Section 312D of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device" in both places where they appear, and substituting in each case the words "an interception device" | ||||||||||
(2) | Section 312D (1) of the principal Act is amended by repealing paragraph (b), and substituting the following paragraph:
|
||||||||||
21F | Effect of warrant Section 312E of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device", and substituting the words "an interception device". |
||||||||||
21G | Emergency permits Section 312G of the principal Act is amended by inserting, after the words "a particular place", the words "or a particular thing, or a particular facility". |
||||||||||
21H | Destruction of irrelevant records made by use of listening device Section 312I of the principal Act is amended my omitting from the head the words " listening device ", and substituting the words " intercepting device ". |
||||||||||
21J | Notice to be given of intention to produce evidence of private communication Section 312L (b) of the principal Act is amended by inserting, alter the word "place", the words "(if known)". |
||||||||||
21K | Inadmissibility of evidence of private communications unlawfully intercepted Section 312M of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "a listening device" wherever they appear, and substituting in each case the words "an interception device". |
||||||||||
21L | Report to be made to Judge on use of warrant or permit Section 312P of the principal Act is amended by omitting the words "listening device" wherever they appear, and substituting in each case the words "interception device". |
||||||||||
21M | Commissioner of Police to give information to Parliament Section 312Q of the principal Act is amended by omitting from paragraph (f) the words "a listening device" in both places where they appear, and substituting the words "an interception device". |
Clause 27
To add, as subsection (2), the following subclause:
(2) | The Crimes (Exemption of Listening Device) Order 1997 (SR 1997/145) is consequentially revoked. |
New heading and clause 29
To insert, after clause 28 (which appears on page 33), the following heading and clause:
29 | Amendments to enactments relating to interception devices The enactments specified in Schedule 3 are amended in the manner included in that schedule. |
New Schedule 3
To add the following schedule:
Schedule 3
Acts relating to listening devices amended
Evidence Act 1908 (1908 No 56) Omit from the heading to section 23B the words " listening device " and substitute the words " interception device ". Omit from section 23B(1) the words "a listening device" and substitute the words "and interception device" |
|||||||||
International Terrorism (Emergency Powers) Act 1987 (1987 No 179) Repeal the definition of intercept and private communication in section 2(1) and substitute, respectively: |
|||||||||
" intercept in relation to a private communication, includes hear, listen to, record, monitor, acquire or receive the communication either---
|
|||||||||
Omit from section 10(3)(a) the word "telephone" and substitute the word "telecommunications". Omit from section 10(3)(b) the word "telephonic". |
|||||||||
Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 1978 (1978 No 65) Repeal the definitions of intercept and private communication in section 10(1) and substitute, respectively: |
|||||||||
" intercept , in relation to a private communicate, includes hear, listen to, records, monitor, acquire or receive the communication either---
|
|||||||||
Repeal the definition of listening device in section 10(1) . Insert in section 10(1) , in its appropriate alphabetical order:
|
|||||||||
Omit from sections 10(1), 14(1), 15(1)b, 15A(1), 15B(1)(b), 16(1)(d), and (2), 17, 25(1) and (4), 28(3) and (4), and 29 the words "a listening device" wherever they appear and substitute in each case the words "an interception device". | |||||||||
Repeal section 14(2)(c) and substitute: | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Repeal section 15A(2)(c) and substitute: | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Repeal section 16(1)(b) and substitute: | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Insert in section 19(1) , after the words "a particular place", the words "or a particular thing or a particular facility". Omit from the headings to sections 21 and 22 the words " listening device " and substitute in each case the words " interception device ". Insert in section 24(b), after the word "place", the words "(if known)". |
|||||||||
Police Act 1958 (1958 No 109) Omit from section 65(3) the words "a listening device", and substitute the words "an interception device". |
|||||||||
Telecommunications Act 1987 (1987 No 116) Omit from section 10(1) the words "a listening device" and substitute the words "an interception device" |
Explanatory Note
This Supplementary Order Paper adds a new computer offence to those currently included in the Crimes Amendment Bill (No 6) , amends the existing interception offences in Part IXA of the Crimes Act 1961 (the principal Act), amends the police interception warrant regime contained in Part XIA of the principal Act and Part II of the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 1978 , and makes related changes to other enactments.
The new computer offense ( new section 305ZFA ) is the offence of accessing a computer system without authorisation. It will be an offence, punishable by an maximum term of 2 years' imprisonment, for a person to intentionally access a computer system or part of a computer system without authorisation, knowing that he or she is not authorised to do so, or being reckless as to whether he or she is authorised to do so. This conduct is commonly referred to as computer "hacking".
The rationale for this offence is the need to protect the security of computer systems. The proposed computer offences currently included in the Crimes Amendment Bill (No 6) cover more serious conduct, such as that which results in gain, loss, or damage. The new offence included in this Supplementary Order Paper relates to unauthorised access where none of these things occurs. The creation of a new offense is justified because, even if no loss of damage occurs, "hacking" may force owners of computer systems who become aware of a hacker's activities to engage in expensive and time-consuming efforts to check whether any damage has been done. The new offence will cover employees who are not authorised to access a particular part of their employers computer system, as well as "hackers" from outside the organisation
Certain qualified exemptions to the new offense are provided for---
- the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service ( new section 305ZFB ):
- the Government Communications Security Bureau ( new section 305ZFC ):
- law enforcement agencies ( new section 305ZFD ).
Employees of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service will only be exempt if acting under an interception warrant obtained under the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Act 1969 . Employees of the Government Communications Security Bureau will only be exempt if acting under an authorisation from the Minister responsible for the Government Communications Security Bureau (a similar procedure to the interception warrant procedure provided in the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Act 1969 ). Without such exemptions, the ability of the security agencies to obtain information would be limited and this would compromise them in the performance of their functions.
Currently, the police and other law enforcement agencies have various powers of search or inspection that authorise searching a computer. The purpose of the exemption for law enforcement agencies is to ensure that the offence (once enacted) does not prevent those law enforcement agencies from carrying out their lawful activities.
The interception offence in section 216B of the principal Act applies only to private oral communications. The Supplementary Order Paper extends the definition of private communications to other forms of private communication that can be intercepted by means of an interception device, such as e-mail, faxes, and message pagers. The mean justification for the change is that all forms of private communication should have the same level of protection, where there is reasonable expectation of privacy. (The extension of the definition of private communication involves other related amendments, such as changing the term listening device to interception device.)
Currently, the offense in section 216B of the principal Act does not apply to the following people or agencies:
- a person who is party to the communication:
- telecommunications employees, to whom exemption contained in the Telecommunications Act 1987 applies, engaged in network maintenance:
- the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, when authorised under the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Act 1969 :
- the police, when authorised, or in an emergency if life or serious injury may be at risk:
- the prison service, if monitoring inmate phone calls under the Penal Institutions Act 1954:
- the Government Communications Security Bureau's Waihopai site (which is exempted by an Order in Council).
The Supplementary Order Paper also exempts from the offence in section 216B of the principal Act interception by employees of Internet or other communications service providers to the public for the purpose of maintaining the system. This is similar to the exemption for telecommunication network operators under the Telecommunications Act 1987. The additional exemption is considered necessary as not all public communication service providers are network operators under the Act.
In addition, the exemption for the Government Communications Security Bureau's Waihopai site, which is in the Crimes (Exemption of Listening Device) Order 1997 (SR 1997/145), is moved (in a modified form) into the principal Act ( new section 216B(5) ). The exemption will now extend to any interception device being operated by the Bureau for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence.
The same amendments proposed to the definitions in Part IXA of the principal Act are also proposed to the definitions applicable to police interception warrants (Part XIA of the principal Act ). Amending the definition of private communication will allow the police to obtain an interception warrant to intercept e-mails, faxes, etc. If the police obtain an interception warrant under Part XIA of the principal Act , it will now be lawful for the police to access that person's electronic as well as oral communications. The existing preconditions that must be satisfied before an interception warrant is granted will continue to apply.